Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Your Guide to Feeling Great and Looking Glamorous

There are some incredible advantages to having good posture. Aside from making you look taller and thinner, good posture enables you to feel your absolute best. When you consider these benefits, it's rather strange more emphasis isn't put on achieving the proper posture. We'd like to introduce you to a man who's out to change that...one spine at a time.


Meet Dr. Paul Drew, a man who has dedicated his life to the subject of posture. Drew began his journey 22 years ago when he earned the credentials to be a certified massage therapist. He went on to receive his Bachelor of Science degree in kinesiology from the University of Southern California in 1996, and ultimately his clinical doctorate degree in physical therapy in 1999.


During the last decade, Dr. Drew's clients have included celebrities such as Madonna, Phil Jackson, Al Pacino, Burt Bacharach, Renee Russo and Sharon Stone. With his skills in both massage and physical therapy, Drew helps patients with issues that range from tense muscles to severe injuries. They are experiences, he claims, that have formed his belief in the importance of having good posture.


Why is Posture Important?


"Where should I start?" asks Drew, stating that chronic tension headaches are one of the first signs of bad posture. It is a trend he has seen in great numbers of patients who spend a lot of time at a computer, especially those who use a laptop.


"The natural tendency," he says, "is to round the shoulders toward the screen." Accentuated with laptop use because of its lower positioning, rounding the shoulders puts incredible strain on the muscles in the neck. This leads to stiff necks and backs, tension headaches and various problems pertaining to the shoulders.


Another affect of rounding the shoulders is the tendency for muscles in the lower back to cave in toward the navel. Drew explained that the body compensates for itself. Whenever there is an imbalance in one area, the body creates an imbalance in another. Once the lower back starts caving in, issues such as lower back pain, herniated discs, and arthritis of the spine start to occur. The doctor added that problems with either the hips or knees could easily follow next.


According to Drew, practicing good posture will not only protect you from injury and enable you to live a healthier and more active life, but it will also improve your self-esteem. He says it's a practice that both lengthens and slims the body, claiming that no matter the body type it is sure to have aesthetic affects. It is this belief that inspired Drew to write his book.


Red Carpet Posture


"I feel it's become a little too popular, especially for women, to have bad posture," states Drew. Noticing it first by watching celebrities on the red carpet, he says that it has become almost en vogue for women to slouch. Drew looks at his book, Red Carpet Posture, as a way to correct this by providing knowledge, advice and exercises on how to achieve and maintain good posture.


The exercises, he says, are targeted to strengthening the muscles that help with posture. Tried and true, they are relatively easy to do and can fit into any workout regimen. He says they also carry secondary benefits such as helping with weight control, body fat maintenance and overall conditioning.


"Good posture is glamorous!" says Drew, adding that it was actually a prerequisite for being an actor or actress back in the Golden Age of film. Glamour is something he'd like to bring back for everyone, claiming that along with it will come enhanced confidence and self-esteem.


What Causes Bad Posture?


Seeking a glimpse into his book, we asked Dr. Drew about some of the behaviors that cause bad posture. "Weight gain, especially in the belly, can play a big role," he claims. Reiterating the idea that the body compensates for itself, he says excess belly weight is just another means for the lower back to start caving inward.


How we sit also affects our posture. From driving in our cars to sitting at a desk working on the computer, Drew says that most people don't give it nearly enough thought.


Claiming it all starts with positioning, Drew recommends choosing a desk and chair that are the correct height for your body. The second step is using a computer stand to position the monitor at eye level. This helps the shoulders stay back, as opposed to rolling forward.


He also suggests staying away from desk chairs with wheels. Citing the fact that most floors aren't perfectly flat or even, chairs on wheels have a tendency to roll. Even if the floor's difference is slight, Dr. Drew says the act of using your feet to brace yourself puts undo stress on the lower back.


Sitting in one spot for too long a time is also a negative, as our muscles and concentration will eventually start to tire. He recommends keeping track of the time we sit at our desks or behind the wheel of a car. As a regular practice, Drew advises, "Take a break every hour or so to get up and walk around."


Another horrible habit according to the doctor is the practice of talking on the telephone with it pinned between our ear and shoulder. It is an unnatural position for our neck that puts undo stress on the entire body. It is easily remedied, however, by purchasing an inexpensive headset at any office supply store.


The bed you sleep in is also a big deal when it comes to your posture, but it has less to do with the mattress's firmness than it does its evenness. Drew says that most mattresses have a tendency to weaken in the middle over the course of time, causing the spine to conform to that shape. He says if your mattress is more than seven years old, you should look into buying a new one.


Pillows are also important. Drew suggests finding a thickness and firmness that works for you. The most important factor, however, is where you place your head on the pillow. He says no matter if you sleep on your back or side you should position the fattest part of the pillow directly underneath the base of your skull. This placement is optimal for keeping the spine in a straight position.


How Do We Correct Our Posture?


Aside from the exercises he puts forth in his book, Drew offers up a few tips that will have an immediate positive effect on your posture.


The doctor recommends focusing on keeping your shoulder blades down and pulled back. He likens it to imagining you have an orange on your back and you're trying to squeeze it with your shoulder blades. Doing so will not only lengthen the spine, but it will also take undo pressure off the muscles in your neck.


In addition, Drew advises to keep your bellybutton drawn up and in toward your spine. This action, he says, will rotate your hips so they are positioned underneath you, providing both balance and support.


The doctor also gives some advice you've probably already heard - suck in your stomach. He's says it not only serves as a good reminder for his shoulder and bellybutton techniques, but it also burns calories and strengthens abdominal muscles.


Considering that good posture has a lot to do with training your muscles to stay in certain positions, Dr. Drew has developed a line of clothing that provides some much needed help. Teaming up with fashion designer and Project Runway contestant, Vincent Libretti, Drew is launching a line of clothes he refers to as "active couture-wear".


With the ability to be worn daily, as well as to fancy occasions, the clothing is designed to accentuate the female body. What makes the clothing truly unique, however, is that whenever a woman slouches, the clothes pull on her muscles to let her know. He likes this idea because the woman is using her own body, as opposed to a support or a brace, to correct her posture. It also serves as the perfect parallel to his mantra - having good posture is the greatest fashion statement you can make.




Technorati : , ,

Del.icio.us : , ,

Zooomr : , ,

Flickr : , ,

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Cup of Coffee Pork Roast

Recipe For January!


It's a cup of joe -- as in java -- that brings this poignant pork roast to life. To say it's brewing in goodness would be an understatement.




Main Ingredient


Cooking Method


Difficulty


Course/Dish



Makes

6-8 servings





1 Cup of Coffee Pork Roast

Created by The MDM Team, Sunday, 17 February 2008
It's a cup of joe -- as in java -- that brings this poignant pork roast to life. To say it's brewing in goodness would be an understatement.



Ingredients

3 lb. pork roast, trimmed of fat


1 tbsp. vegetable oil


1/4 cup soy
sauce


1 cup coffee


2
bay leaves


1 clove garlic, minced


1/2 tsp. oregano


2 onions, sliced


Additional coffee and soy sauce as needed






Methods/steps



  1. Preheat oven to 300 degrees.

  2. Heat oil in large skillet over high heat, and then sear meat on both sides. In a large roasting pan, combine one onion and remaining ingredients. Transfer browned meat to roasting pan and top with second onion.

  3. Cover and bake 3 1/2 to 4 hours. Baste every hour with juices. If liquid begins to boil away, add more coffee or soy sauce as needed. Use pan juices to make gravy. Use no salt.






Additional Tips

Ready in 4 hours


For more information about Food - Visit http://www.robertjrussell.com - you won't find any recipes on this site - but I think you might like it!




Technorati : , , ,

Del.icio.us : , , ,

Zooomr : , , ,

Flickr : , , ,

Saturday, January 09, 2010

Government health insurance option appears doomed

WASHINGTON - Senior House Democrats have largely abandoned hopes of including a government-run insurance option in the final compromise health care bill taking shape, according to several officials, and are pushing for other measures to rein in private insurers.


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other senior Democrats told President Barack Obama in recent meetings they want the legislation to strip the insurance industry of a long-standing exemption from federal antitrust laws, officials said. That provision is in the House-passed measure, but was omitted from the bill that the Senate passed on Christmas Eve.


They also want the final measure to include a House-passed proposal for a nationwide insurance exchange, to be regulated by the federal government, where consumers could shop for private coverage. The Senate bill calls for a state-based system of exchanges.


Additionally, House Democrats want to require insurers to spend a minimum amount of premium income on benefits, thereby limiting what is available for salaries, bonuses, advertising and other items. The House bill sets the floor at 85 percent; the Senate-passed measure lowers it to 80 percent for policies sold to small groups and individuals.


The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the negotiations are private.


The maneuvering comes as the White House and majority Democrats intensify efforts to agree on a final measure, possibly before Obama delivers his State of the Union address late this month or early in February.Government intervention into the insurance market is one of the most contentious issues to be settled. Others include the fate of a Senate-passed tax on high-cost insurance plans, bitterly opposed by some labor unions; the extent to which abortions could be covered by insurance to be sold in the new exchanges; and the amount of money available to help lower-income families purchase coverage.


Liberals long have pressed to include a government-run insurance option in the legislation, arguing it would create competition for private companies and place a brake on costs.


House Democrats included it in their legislation. In the Senate, it drew opposition from Democratic moderates whose votes are essential to the bill's fate. Even attempts to include an expansion of Medicare for uninsured individuals as young as age 55 - widely viewed as a face-saving proposal for liberals - had to be jettisoned.


Given the opposition in the Senate, Pelosi, D-Calif., signaled late last year she did not view a public option as a requirement for a final compromise. Asked in an interview Dec. 16 whether she could support legislation without it, she said, "It depends what else is in the bill."


More recently, she listed her goals for a House-Senate compromise without mentioning the provision she long has backed.


"We are optimistic that there is much that we have in common in both of our bills and that we will resolve or reconcile this legislation in a way that is a triple A rating: affordability for the middle class, accountability for the insurance companies, and accessibility to many more people in our country to quality, affordable health care," she said.


While Obama favors a government option, he has said repeatedly it is only a small part of his overall effort to remake the health care system, and is not essential.


Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., have expressed optimism about chances for a swift agreement, but there appears to be relatively little maneuvering room. That is particularly true in the Senate, where 60 votes will be needed to overcome a Republican filibuster, and any change carries the risk of alienating a Democrat whose vote is crucial.


The bill's future is further complicated by a scheduled Jan. 19 election in Massachusetts. Some polls show Democrat Martha Coakley in a closer-than-expected race against Republican Scott Brown and an independent contender. The winner will replace Sen. Paul Kirk, who became the 60th member of the Democratic caucus when he was named to his seat as successor to the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.A Republican upset would deprive Democrats of their 60th vote.


Some House Democrats say the proposed government insurance option remains alive, although they speak publicly of its possible demise as long as insurance companies aren't let off the hook.


California Rep. Xavier Becerra, who's on the leadership team, said House members would only be willing to abandon the public plan if they were certain the final bill achieves the goals they want, as Pelosi described.


"We're willing to give up what's good for America as long as we get something good back," he said.



Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, also a member of the leadership, agreed.


"I think the House is very much of a view that before they'd consider dropping the public option" they have to be assured of a bill that achieves the goals they wanted the public option to meet.


But officials said little if any time has been spent in White House meetings on the issue, and there was scant discussion of it during a conference call for members of the Democratic rank and file earlier this week.





Technorati : , , ,

Del.icio.us : , , ,

Zooomr : , , ,

Flickr : , , ,

Thursday, January 07, 2010

Start your own Social Network

Many people ask me how I get so much business....and it is a very simple answer but you may not believe it but I have my own Social Network.


Some people use Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace etc - I use the Robert J Russell Social Network


If you would like to join the Robert J Russell Social Network - simply click on this link:


http://robertjrussellsocialnetwork.ning.com/profiles/members/




Come Join us today !!


Robert J Russell - 972-679-9029




Technorati : , , ,

Del.icio.us : , , ,

Zooomr : , , ,

Flickr : , , ,

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Obama backs high-end health plan tax

WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama signaled to House Democratic leaders Wednesday that they'll have to drop their opposition to taxing high-end health insurance plans to pay for health coverage for millions of uninsured Americans.


In a meeting at the White House, Obama expressed his preference for the insurance tax contained in the Senate's health overhaul bill, but largely opposed by House Democrats and organized labor, Democratic aides said. The aides spoke on condition of anonymity because the meeting was private.


House Democrats want to raise income taxes on high-income individuals instead and are reluctant to abandon that approach, while recognizing that they will likely have to bend on that and other issues so that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., can maintain his fragile 60-vote majority support for the bill.


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and four committee chairmen met with the president Wednesday as they scrambled to resolve differences between sweeping bills passed by the House and Senate. The aim is to finalize legislation revamping the nation's health care system in time for Obama's State of the Union address early next month.


Despite the dispute over the payment approach, Pelosi, D-Calif., emerged from the meeting expressing optimism.


"We've had a very intense couple of days," Pelosi said. "After our leadership meeting this morning, our staff engaged with the Senate and the administration staff to review the legislation, suggest legislative language. I think we're very close to reconciliation."


Congressional staff members stayed at the White House into the evening to continue work, and a conference call of the full House Democratic caucus was scheduled for Thursday. Obama is taking a more direct role than ever, convening Oval Office meetings Tuesday and Wednesday of House Democratic leaders.


The House and Senate bills are alike in many ways. Both impose first-time requirements for almost all Americans to purchase health insurance, providing subsidies for lower- and middle-income people to help them do so, though the subsidies in the House bill are more generous. Both establish new marketplaces called exchanges where people can go to shop for and compare healthinsurance plans. Both would ban unpopular insurance company practices including denying coverage to people with pre-existing health conditions.


Differences include whom to tax, how many people to cover, how to restrict taxpayer funding for abortion and whether illegal immigrants should be allowed to buy coverage in the new markets with their own money. The House bill covers about 36 million uninsured Americans over 10 years, costing more than $1 trillion, while the cheaper Senate bill covers about 31 million.


House Democrats are steeling themselves to abandon establishment of a new government insurance plan opposed by moderates in the Senate, but in return hope to get the Senate to rescind insurers' antitrust exemption, make subsidies more affordable and agree to establishment of national rather than state health insurance exchanges, among other things. Obama has signaled his support for the House position on the subsidies and other areas, aides said.


The difference in how the bills are paid for is emerging as among the toughest disputes.


The House wants to increase income taxes on individuals making more than $500,000 and couples over $1 million, which would raise $460 billion over 10 years to pay for the bill. The Senate wants to tax insurance companies on plans valued at over $8,500 for individuals and $23,000 for couples, raising $150 billion. Most analysts say the insurance tax would be passed on to consumers, and organized labor is strongly opposed, as are House Democrats, some of whom contend that the tax would violate Obama's campaign pledge not to tax the middle class.


"We did in our house bill something that protects middle class Americans from having to pay more for health insurance," Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., a member of the House leadership, said Wednesday. "So far we want to stay to that principle."


House members "have been very clear on that issue and working with the president to stick to what he said when he was campaigning for president, we're trying to make sure this does not affect middle class Americans," Becerra said.


Obama has defended the tax as a way to drive down health costs.


"I'm on record as saying that taxing Cadillac plans that don't make people healthier but just take more money out of their pockets because they're paying more for insurance than they need to, that's actually a good idea, and that helps bend the cost curve," the president said in an interview with National Public Radio just before Christmas. "That helps to reduce the cost of health care over the long term. I think that's a smart thing to do."


In the end the House likely will have to accept the insurance plan tax at some level - say starting with plans valued at $25,000 or more, with carve-outs for certain union professions - but it might not happen without a fight.


A provision in the Senate bill to increase the Medicare payroll tax on high-earners could provide some middle ground, although that measure would raise only $87 billion over a decade.


By ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Write


(This version CORRECTS that Obama's State of the Union address to be early next month.)




Technorati : , , , , , , , , ,

Del.icio.us : , , , , , , , , ,

Zooomr : , , , , , , , , ,

Flickr : , , , , , , , , ,